Seven Deaths in the Cat’s Eye (1973)

Seven Deaths in the Cat’s Eye makes about as much sense as its title, but it’s fun to watch it unfold, bereft of logic and lucidity, provided you’re into Gothic cinematic trappings. While this one comes from the country and era of the giallo, it has more in common with AIP’s Edgar Allan Poe cycle from Roger Corman.

Blame it on the pussy.

Expelled from her all-girl Catholic school, a young woman with the unfortunate name of Corringa (Jane Birkin) returns to her family’s castle at a time of chaos and crisis, with the owners being pressured to sell it all and move away. Corringa’s ready to party until she accidentally throws the Bible into a roaring fire, supposedly inviting bad juju.

Must be true, because shortly thereafter, she discovers a rotting corpse in the castle’s underground tunnels, not to mention a caged gorilla. He’s the pet of Lord James (Hiram Keller), who’s possibly insane and rumored to have killed someone, and possibly even has the power to shape-shift. And every time the titular tabby shows up, someone gets killed, thereby putting the “ow” in “meow.”

Even in the muddy print I saw, the mood set by director Antonio Margheriti (Cannibal Apocalypse) was palpable, fueled by striking visuals more interesting than the murder mystery at its dark heart. You could do worse than having to ogle Birkin for a good portion of it; speaking of the songstress, her rapscallion lover, Serge Gainsbourg, has a small role as an investigating police detective. —Rod Lott

Buy it at Amazon.

2 thoughts on “Seven Deaths in the Cat’s Eye (1973)”

  1. I knew this had to be a giallo movie. They all have these titles with animals, insects and birds: Bird with the Crystal Plumage, Four Flies on Grey Velvet, A Dragonfly for Each Corpse,
    Iguana with the Tongue of Fire, etc., etc. Is this available on DVD? If so, I’ll go hunting.

    1. It is! Blue Underground has released it in the States; I got mine a couple weeks ago in an imported Dagored edition at Half Price Books, factory-sealed. The print was muddy, as referenced in the review, but hey, $4.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *