Warlock: The Armageddon (1993)

Watching this sequel to 1991’s Warlock, I started to wonder if maybe a young Michael Bay had seen it before debuting with 1995’s Bad Boys. The third film by second-generation director Anthony Hickox (Waxwork), this second entry in the Warlock mythos not only shares part of a title with one of Bay’s films, but displays all of the same stylistic hallmarks that have made Bay both one of the successful and hated filmmakers of his generation.

Filled with pointless close-ups shot at strange angles, hilariously dramatic pull-ins and a complete sacrifice of character in favor of constant momentum, Warlock: The Armageddon, like most of Bay’s work, plays less like an actual movie than an abridged version of one with all of the potentially boring bits cut out.

And that is so not a bad thing.

For those of you concerned about the plot, the film features a returning Julian Sands as the titular villain, an Antichrist who rises in anticipation of a long-awaited lunar eclipse and who must find a collection of ancient stones in order to help his father, Satan, escape from Hell and take over the living world. Stopping him are Chris Young (TV’s Max Headroom) and Paula Marshall (whom you know from a dozen cancelled shows … and my dreams), the youngest descendents of a tribe of California druids, whose deaths and subsequent resurrections make them the only warriors powerful enough to halt Sands in his tracks.

More goofy than scary, the movie features a lot of dated effects, but is made highly watchable, thanks to the game cast and Hickox’s stubborn refusal to give you enough time to dwell on the film’s many absurdities and enormous plot holes. Consider it a film for those of you who wish a certain “director” would stop wasting his “talents” on racist toy-robot sequels and get back to the gloriously stupid basics. —Allan Mott

Buy it at Amazon.


3 Responses to “Warlock: The Armageddon (1993)”

  • Patrick Says:

    The first Warlock movie is watchable, and the Third is almost bad enough to be a guilty pleasure, but the second is just forgetable. I rewatch it a few week ago and remember nothing about it. There is nothing in this film that worth remembering.

  • Allan Says:

    Patrick, I wrote this review a year ago and I still remember:

    1) Warlock turns dude into a piece of experimental sculpture

    2) Warlock flies fashion lady into the sky and drops her onto the runway when he gets what he wants from her

    3) Warlock born fully grown from hot lady in mini-skirt

    4) Paula Marshall in short summer dress with bicycle short underwear

    And that’s just off the top of my head. I suspect I could recall a lot more if I really thought about it.

  • Patrick Says:

    Allan, it made more of impression on you then it did on me. Of the four things you mention, I recall two of them, 2 and 3. There is nothing wrong with this movie but having seen it this year for the first time since the early 1990’s, I in no hurry to see it again. You like it more than I did. I sure there are films that I enjoyed that you can’t stand. Fair enough.

Leave a Reply